Why todays parents are saying no to circumcision
Posted in Circumcision and tagged with Child Development, Circumcision on 04/14/2009 10:02 pm by RachaelDetroit Motherhood Examiner: Why todays parents are saying no to circumcision
I have one thing to ask before you continue on with this article. Open your mind, read the information without defenses. I have had my own personal journey with circumcision, my son is circumcised, and I will admit I thought the idea of not circumcising was just…weird. So I get the resistance to the culture shift, I really do.
We are the only country that routinely circumcises our infants at birth for non religious reasons. This is not the norm in other countries. In fact when speaking with a European friend of mine who was expecting a boy, she said she would not only not circumcise her son, but that she would never stand for it. When you live in a culture that does not routinely circumcise, the question becomes why would you.
So, do Europeans and their intact penises have mystery penis problems? Are they dirty? Do they have a higher rate of sexually transmitted diseases? The answer is no. Really? Are these not the main problems that we are trying to avoid?
First let’s examine some of what is lost after a circumcision is performed in the United States (In the US, most hospital circumcisions are done to the Bris Periah standard of removing every ounce of foreskin and, in a large percentage of cases, some shaft skin).
Foreskin: The foreskin comprises around 50% of the movable skin system of the penis. In fact the average foreskin if spread out, would be about 15 square inches. The average adult foreskin has three to four feet of blood vessels and amazingly between 10,000 and 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of several types. All of this is removed.
Ridged Band: The ridged band is comprised of soft ridges near where the inner and outer foreskin meet. This is the primary erogenous zone in an intact male penis.
Meissner’s Corpuscles: Meissner’s Corpuscles are thousands of coiled fine touch receptors. This is arguably the most important sensory component of the foreskin.
Other losses include:
Gliding Action
Frenulum
Dartos Fascia
Immunological System
Lymphatic Vessels
Estrogen Receptors
Apocrine Glands
Sebaceous Glands
Langerhans Cells
Natural Glans Coloration
Length and Circumference
Dorsal Nerves
So while the adult penis “works” when circumcised, it is arguable that it doesn’t come close to the experience it is designed for. I was always under the impression just a little extra “flap” of skin was removed — such an old myth.
One of the first defenses to circumcision I always here is that a cut penis is cleaner. In reality the opposite is true in infancy. The intact infant penis does not retract so care is so much easier. You just wipe and go! And when the boy is older and the foreskin separates from the glans I am positive they can learn to pull back the foreskin and rinse. We teach our girls proper hygiene and our boys are just as capable. In fact world wide female circumcision is a much more practiced procedure. And the main reason cultures site is that a circumcised vagina is cleaner. Things that make you go hmmm…
Let’s tackle sexually transmitted diseases. This is a big one and I will to be brief and clear. The study done in Africa regarding circumcision and HIV has caused much undeserved buzz. The study says circumcision decreased the transmission of HIV. While this may be true, the study was never finished. Time for the circumcised group to heal was not factored into the equation, and they stopped mid study to circumcise the control group.
Just pause to really think about whether routine infant circumcision decreases STD’s in the united states. We have the highest rates of circumcision and we do not have lower rates of sexually transmitted diseases. Also, why don’t countries that do not routinely circumcise, and are on the same level socially as America, have much higher HIV rates than us? The data is out there, and it just does not support this theory.
This just barely scratches the surface but my hope is it will give you pause — and prompt some investigation into the issue on your own. Here is a great article on what can happen when a circumcision goes wrong. Is it worth the risk?
Posted using ShareThis
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!



April 15th, 2009 at 12:35 am
You’ve made a very good case for rejecting circumcision, with which I agree. However, I am puzzled as to which you circumcised your son. Was it because you didn’t know all the facts before you made that decision?
April 15th, 2009 at 1:06 am
Yes, I am ashamed to say that I did circumcise my son without doing any research and am sick about it. It is my job to question all things in the best interest of my children and in this case I didn’t. Quite honestly where I live in the midwest circ rates are so insanely high I never even knew anybody adult or infant that was intact so it just didn’t occur to me to question it. In fact, it took almost a solid year of my own research and questioning before I fully “got” it. I tell people, once you see this clearly, you can not believe you were so ignorant.
My son had some issues his first year and I am pretty sure his circ had a lot to do with it. But with constant love, and meeting all of his needs etc, I believe he no longer has trust issues. I just hope he is not mad at me when he is older!
April 15th, 2009 at 1:22 am
Our family thought we were crazy to not go with circ for our sons. That was many years ago now. No real problems, so I guess it’s been ok.
April 22nd, 2009 at 3:40 pm
Wow! You are really helping to change minds and attitudes. Proud of you!
April 24th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
I knew little about this issue when I circ’d my first son. The second time around (when I went almost completely granola.. we learn soooooo much through experience) I did struggle A LOT with the decision. We ultimately chose to circ our second son too, for a variety of reasons. My reasons (however flawed they might be) are:
1. Since older brother was circumcised, we thought it would make them feel odd/leftout/different if they didn’t look the same. I’m all for openness, but that was a conversation I didn’t want to have. “mommy, why does Julesy’s pee-pee have more skin than mine” - “oh, that’s because mommy didn’t know enough to leave yours alone, so you just get to suffer from my ignorance.” You see where this is going. I’m going to have a hard enough time explaining why my first son wasn’t breastfed, came out by c-section, and ate babyfood out of jars. My first was a guinea pig.
#2. I’m personally grossed out by the non-circ’d ones. I’ve been in sexual contact with them, and all I can remember was the terribly foul smell, and the schmegma (however you spell that.) It really made me want to vomit. These were clean guys too. No offense… it’s just how I feel. And I couldn’t stand the thought of some girl thinking that way about one of my sons in 20 years.
#3. My husband is circ’d and he felt like our boys would want to be circ’d later in life if we didn’t do it when they were babies. Of the guys he knows that are left intact, few of them like it. Getting circ’d later is considerably more painful, and more traumatic, than just having it done as an infant.
So, those were my reasons. Most granola moms wouldn’t agree, but there it is.